Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Control, My Ass

The main purpose of Pickle's blog is CONTROL.

* To incite hatred amongst the Clay Fans, turning them against Clay as well as each other, trying to convince the fans that he is a victim that was used against his will.

* To try to convince the fans that Clay is gay when we know he's not. Then further calling Clay a hypocrite, a liar, a con, and a manipulator, borrowing from Pickle's own traits (and only the Pickle is right).

* to humiliate, and embarrass Clay and his family; pry into his private life and post titillating tid-bits of a sexual nature from a Gherkin's experiences, NOT Clay's.

* To continually criticize, bash, make fun of Clay, his voice and music and inciting others, including minors, to do so as well.

* Taking various things that Clay may say in a joking manner and posting them on his blog - not as a joke ...but as factual, twisting Clay's words and using them against him in an exaggerated manner.

* Taking things that friends and fans may say, repeating them out of context to use against Clay.

* Using archived files and exaggerating the content to use against Clay.

Purple Pecker has an agenda: to destroy Clay Aiken. Pickle claims to have honor and integrity but has never displayed any signs of it on his blog. The majority of Clay's fans are strong minded and not easily led - but some fans are more vulnerable and may be convinced to turn against Clay - and this is what Purple Gherkin hopes to accomplish with his blog. There is too much to write here - but even with just this.....I still feel sorry for Gherkin as he is not a happy man. But how can you find happiness at the expense of so many???


Dropped off by an Anonymous blogger
Edited by Oh Crap

208 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 208 of 208
Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...
John is now making claims that he knows Ruben and Ruben knows about his dirty blog."

Butty is such a liar that if he said the sky was blue, I'd have to seriously rethink what I know to be true about the sky.

Truth Rules said...

I have a choice whether to believe Clay or stalkerboy. I choose to believe Clay when he says the tabloid stories are not true. That means the tabloid stories are lies, hence the story teller(s) lied. Can't sue me for what I believe nor for having an opinion. Free speech and all that good stuff.

And to the anonymous person making threats towards me on my blog; you don't scare me.

Anonymous said...

I am crushed. All this talk about breastesses. WRU 42 D's! Clay wouldn't like me. My day is ruined. I just knew he was a breast beasty. I've seen the glances. Off to sulk.

Anonymous said...

I dought that Ruben has time or would want anything to do with JP. I consider Ruben to be better than that. He may have heard of him but thats probably the extent of it.

JP seriously needs help. As in help with his severe mental illness. How could he be proud of himself now? About anything.

Oh Crap said...

New Blog is UP. I think pretty soon his fernids in high places are going to invest in cement.

Anonymous said...

I am so glad that several of you know or work for attorneys.

Anonymous said...

Oh Crap,

Thats funny. we can only hope.

Oh Crap said...

Reposting after a little edit:

Linda said...
Hey ladies = thanks for the heads-up about buttplug's threats towards us.

My crack team of attorneys and I find the whole thing quite comical.

Yo, asswipe - I'm gonna explain this to you once and once only in plain english cause you wouldn't understand the legal aspects if your life depended on it - oh wait - it just might!!

YOU HAVE NO FREAKING CASE!!!! You made yourself a "celebrity" by going to the press, doing interviews and getting things in print about your alleged (yes alleged cause it NEVER HAPPENED!!) tryst with one cutesexysingerguy.

Now that you are a "celebrity" of sorts, you have lost the opportunity to sue us because of a little thing you may have heard of called the CONSTITUTION.

There are exceptions to defamation rules for politicians and celebrities and, to a limited extent, for people who have become the subjects of a public controversy. These people, because they are in the public eye, are expected to have tougher skins and can only be defamed if it is proven that the false statements were made with actual malice and a reckless disregard for the truth--for example, a website owner posting what he knows to be false information about a celebrity's sex life.

Do you know that that means??? Huh? Do ya? Do ya?

Put that in your pipe and smoke it, asshole.

8:45 AM

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 208 of 208   Newer› Newest»