Thursday, March 29, 2007

Holleman vs Aiken: Greed vs Class

A few comments have already made their way here and I'll be bringing over related comments that were posted to the previous blog. For those who want to get current with the latest, you can read it here:

http://clay-aiken-news.blogspot.com/2007/0...clay-aiken.html

Seems that Ms. Holleman's attorney chose to showboat a topic that had NOTHING to do with the case at hand and in essence was outclassed "on all fours" by Clay's attorney. What the outcome will be, I have no clue. I'm not too trusting of justice anymore. If the system works correctly the judge will throw out this frivolous suit, penalize the plaintiff and her attorney, and Rockey baby will be disbarred for her total lack of ethics. Using Ms. Holleman's past abuse experiences as relevant in her presentation seems out of whack. Could it be that these women never expected this to make it through the Courts? Were they expecting some sort of payoff before things advanced into the judge's hands?

Backtracking some facts:

The plaintiff's attorney left a shitty message in the book review section of Amazon.com months ago totally ignoring the book and writing a review of her case. Something very familiar about her dropping an innuendo into that "review" as well. At first people were giving the benefit of the doubt that maybe it was just one of the haters doing their thing in one of their chosen fields,Impersonation, but then the attorney pretty much played the same card on her site.

I don't believe I've ever seen anything like this which made me contemplate my navel. Why? Is she a Kelly Clarkson fan, a Ruben Studdard fan, part of the Gay Hit Contingency? Or is she just that loony? JP claimed in the past to "know" Jeannie Holleman and he thought about using Ms Rockey himself at some point in time. Things that make you go, "Hmmmmmmm?" If I was Clay's attorney I'd issue a subpoena for Ms. Holleman's bank statements to see if her attorney PAID HER to file this suit.

I'm open to anyone else's theory if you have one.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

History Repeats Itself

In light of the John Paulus confession and in light of the fact that he mentioned that the webam escapade was really a conversation between Clay and some women, someone figured it was time to bring out the proof that there was NO webcam escapade. It didn't happen, folks, with anyone. Here is a dose of history (with some additions) for those who want a refresher and for those who never saw ..... THE BIG BUST!

http://anti-fans-411.blogspot.com/

Saturday, March 03, 2007

SO HERE WE ARE!

JP has confessed that he never met Clay though he managed to still leave a little bull tickie behind on his blog. For those who haven't read what was copied from his blog, here is some of what he said:

"John Paulus said...Percocet is a victim of the "haters" influences. When I started defending Clay they became unhinged. Clay and I never met nor have we ever had sex. To my knowledge he is straight or bi curious. I will share more about this scheme put together by posters on the 411 over the weekend. 3/02/2007 1:15 AM"

"I'll give you the honor of my presence to share that Clay nor anyone has put me up to anything. I did not have sex with Clay, I have never met Clay for sex, and I don't know if Clay is gay or not. The hook ups and emails were all concocted and Clay has been a victim of a ruse. The Claymates were right all along and so were you Percocet. I'm just a lying, evil man and you have help me to see that I need to change and be honest so that's why I'm finally sharing the truth. Sorry Clay for the year of lies against you.John Paulus 03.02.07 - 4:05 am "

"John Paulus said... Oh Good.. you're finally going to admit you lied.

Yep. 3/02/2007 1:09 AM "

"John Paulus said... Would you love me if I told you it was nothing but a story concocted by another Idols fans and I was nothing, but the front person in this scheme? 3/02/2007 1:11 AM"

"John Paulus said... I've never met Clay. So how can there be a connection? 3/02/2007 1:15 AM "

"John Paulus said... Percocet is a victim of the "haters" influences. When I started defending Clay they became unhinged. Clay and I never met nor have we ever had sex. To my knowledge he is straight or bi curious. I will share more about this scheme put together by posters on the 411 over the weekend. 3/02/2007 1:19 AM "

"John Paulus said...If media wish to speak to me about this I will explain that this was all a hoax. Now really I have to go to work in a few hours. I must go to sleep and plus, I may have a new boyfriend."

"John Paulus said...Were you paid?My only compensation was that they would get me in touch with Lucas to do porno."

"John Paulus said...Percocet is just a numb front person. It's the others on there that are behind this whole thing. When I had my blog I would occasionally post and that's why you say different styles and why it appeared on was on all night. There are a group of 8 people. I was recuited back in July of 2005 from bigmuscle.com. They saw me there and that I was muscular, attractive, and from NC. and persuaded me to help them. So we worked out this scheme over 6 months and put it into place going over ever detail. I even took 3 prior lie detector test so that I could pass one by any media that gave me one."

"John Paulus said...Why are you doing this NOW? What has changed?Because when I told the haters I was over this and didn't want to be a part of their game and I defended Clay by saying he looked good and happy on Kimmel they attacked me and said I was a traitor. I can not go on lying for them and destroying a good person."

"John Paulus said...Are you saying Clay is not gay? And the evidence they had, was that Clay with a man or a woman?And where did you get your inside information? Like before going on GMA in Sept. that he was on meds?When we started the blog there were people who disliked Clay's saying that LA had rotting guts and they were willing to share information on Clay. Clay pissed off some powerful people by not playing ball."

"John Paulus said...By the way, I believe revnoles account was rick's but I can't be for certain."

~~~

As most of us have read, he is now trying to convince people that the webcam shots were actually taken while Clay was talking to women but we already know that the webcams were photoshops, proven so by the "We Support Clay Aiken" blog back in late May/early June. He's also saying that one of the gals had her boyfriend pretend to be the "Boston School Teacher" which we know exists about as much as the webcam conversation and the webcam photos.

The above are only chosen excerpts of John repeating a question and then answering it; I saw no need to copy the comments since they are unimportant and of the same ilk as always. The fact is that JP admits the smear campaign was a hoax and changing a few details doesn't make the webcam crap any more credible than it was the first time around.

Now we come to a new blog (which shall go nameless) which printed a very eloquent summary of the "Confession" but whose wording seems very familiar in the comments section. I find it to be bait; the wording is all too familiar.... you know... say a few words on the positive side but make sure you counter with a negative. Ye olde drop the innuendo in hopes of gaining a few recruits.

What I really find amazing is that NONE of the gossip mongers have picked up on the story yet when they were so quick in the past to pick up anything Clay.... as long as it was his (nonexistent) scandal.... as long as it was lies... as long as it dirtied someone clean. Just goes to show that you can't trust a gossip.